« 48 Hour Film Project (First Screening) | Main | 48 Hour Film Project 2005 (Third Screening) »

48 Hour Film Project (Second Screening)

These were the "Group B" films shown more or less in alphabetical order by team name, there was one exception, one teams entry didn't get into the program, and was tacked onto the end. One thing I noticed about the official 48 Hour Film Project trailer was that at the end they thanked the Screen Actor's Guild. Why? Money didn't change hands anywhere, so the union shouldn't really care, I mean except for the part where they feel like actors should make a flat million dollars a minute fee (Unless someone misses a meal, has to work late, or is asked to do something uncomfortable, then they get more.) The screen actor's guild is a lot like The Empire, and the 48 Hour Film Project is sort of like Cloud City. Its a small operation that the Empire really isn't all that interested in. (Unless it suddenly has some sort of stragegic advantage like trapping Jedi or something). This is another discussion for another time.

Lets talk movies! First off I have to say that "Group B" on a whole was better than "Group A" and once again the bar was raised into the atmosphere. If "Group C" continues the trend, next year will be completely mindblowing.

Synthetic by Bonnie and Clyde Productions. The night started off with a bang, almost literally as this film walked the tightrope between gay stereotyping and chauvinism with a big old scoop of Kevin Smith for inspiration. It was cute, funny, edgy and origional. Where they lost out was the technical side, makeup, lights, sound, one scene they forgot to white balance and their actresses looked like zombies. Did they nail Kevin Smith, absolutely not. Did they nail their comedy genre, oh yes. I made this my third pick based on script alone.

Organized Art by Good As A Mugg. These guys won big last year and I see no reason so far why they won't do it again this year. The difference is this year will be a little harder for them due to everyone else stepping up. Did it have problems? Thankfully, yes. I was completely confused and ended up having to try to read my program by the light of my tablet to figure out what genre they had. Finally, they revealed that it was mockumentary and the mob guys were talking to a film crew and not to other mobsters. Once that confusion was out of the way, I laughed and laughed and laughed. After the initial confusion, it proved to be a very solid technical piece with a funny script, and good actors. I gave this film my second pick. This team is sure to take home an award or several again this year.

Where Are the Flying Cars by The Mes. I think this must have been one of this group's first film attempts, and for that it wasn't bad. Credit where credit is due, it was really risky to drive all the way to Nags Head to film a one minute sequence, but it was worth it as it really added to the film's production value. There were huge problems in many places, but for a group of newbies it was a good solid start.

The Super Best Buds by Nexus. Five kids between the ages of 13 and 16 make a superhero movie. In parts I found it embarassing to watch(I remember being that age all too well), but I couldn't deny this group of friends have unlimited potential and one day they will surpass everything we've seen so far in the 48 Hour Film Project. Greensboro needs a filmmaking summercamp for these guys and others like them. I'd volunteer to help.

Silo by Pure Energy Productions. Buddy movie? How can you make a buddy movie when one of the buddies is a ghost and the other is being murdered??? This was a team with a good idea, that needed a tripod and a script revision.

Scarred by See-Saw Productions. They drew horror, and drew upon the relatively recent advances in Japanese horror movie style. I was on the fence with this one after I saw it, and made a note that said so. However, unlike a film I saw last night, the more I thought about this one the more I liked it. They cleverly solved the whole actor problem by having no real dialogue, and only flashes of two people. Where these guys really shined was in the editing room, and though they had a couple of render problems, and some messed up sound it was technically very sound. I could have easily given this my number three pick, and probably would have had I been given an hour to think about it before I voted.

Strangers by Sweaty Tooth Madman. I hated that they opened with some pretty bad graphic's problems, but it didn't take me long to forget about it. This was the film where afterwards we all sat around and tried to figure out what the story was about. Rednecks, sex changes, huh? Not too shabby on the technical side, they had real problems with sound that either happened during shooting or in post, and a few of the handheld shots made me want to hurl, but overall it wasn't too bad. This film wasn't eligable for judging because they went way over in time. I felt like they wanted more time to tell their story, but I think a different editor and director could've told the same story in less time. This team is destined for better in the competitions to come.

The Gift Team Underexposed. What a wild ride! A great deal of stuff happened in seven minutes and it managed not to come off as rushed. The overall production value was so high that the one tiny technical error I saw that most of the audience completely missed crushed my soul. This was a team who like only one of the other teams tonight made the conscious decision to sacrifice nothing in their 48 hours. It was clear that every job in this production was filled by someone who was dedicated not only to the film as a whole but in excellence in the roll they played in it as well. I went back and forth on this one a little but in the end I gave this film my #1 pick. I can't imagine this film not winning something, and with so many excellent elements, its just a matter of the judges picking which element they want to single out the most.

Unforced Entry by Carolina Dream Team. These were essentially first time filmmakers giving a good honest try at the competition. Their story was pretty good, even if I was lost at the ending. Maybe I was supposed to be confused, they did choose mystery. They obviously didn't have much equipment, and what they had they really weren't comfortable with using. I suspect that if they had had an extra six hours in post production they could have fixed 90% of what was wrong and I hope that they will go back and reedit their piece not only for practice but to use in other competitions.

So my voted on picks were "The Gift", "Organized Art" and "Synthetic". Had I had another hour to think about it I would've switched "Scarred" with "Synthetic", but I do not by any means regret my decisions.

Over everything I have seen in the past two days, my picks would be "The Gift", "Organized Art", and "Unhinged: The Sly Stephen's Story". But I am not 100% certain in what order I would place them.

If you are free tonight, come out to the Carousel theater to catch the "Group C" films at either 6:30pm or 8:30pm, if these past two nights are any indication, you will not be disappointed.

Or if the weekend is more your thing, come out to the Sky Bar at 7pm on Saturday the 30th for the awards ceremony. The "Best Overall" award will be given at 9pm with the technical awards going first. Who knows, maybe they will be able to show the winners. (Hear that Ed and Nisha?)

Comments

Secure a projector, a dvcam playing device, and a screen and we'll show them.

Isn't it kind of ridiculous for you to be reviewing your own film, giving high it marks, while at the same time critiquing other film makers. You even gave your own film, your number one pick?

Woody:

Your blog URL was posted to the TIFN list yesterday and needless to say a number of people are not amused. While you are certainly entitled to blog anything you want, are you trying to help the local film community or hurt it?

First, do we really need "reviews" of 48 Hour films? Reviews don't help pros much (talking to audiences does) and they certainly don't help beginners or first-timers.

Second, your blog is public and is now circulating around the TIFN community. I'm concerned about the kids and first/time amatuer filmmakers reading these comments and not entering again.

Third - not disclosing your role in "The Gift" is just bad blogging journalism. It calls into question every review you wrote.

Finally, your reviews contain a number of technical errors. I saw most of the films twice and you confused artistic choices with technical problems a number of times. Unless you are prepared to view the films carefully before commenting, you should disclose how much time and how many times you viewed them.

People busted their asses to make these films and if you going to review them, at least make a better effort to give constructive feedback.

Because of your blog and negative comments made on the Greensboro 48 Hour board, I have posted an essay in rebuttal at:

http://stephenv2.com/thepoint.htm

I hope next year you will run your own team, make a film and perhaps empathize more with what it takes to make a 48 Hour film.

stephen

Wow - guess you guys missed the 7 atricles he posted before the reviews that he wrote about being ON a team.

Granted - he didn't put a disclaimer on here about his involvement - but most people who read his blog have been reading it all along - so they know about him being on the underexposed team. Well, a mountain was made out of a molehill, so now people are coming only read the reviews and not the whole story. I mean really - his blog wouldn't have gotten NEAR the attention he has gotten if a poop storm hadn't been made about it.

After the controversy had blown over and I had breathing room to do a real analysis of my 48 Hour Film Project story arc, I realized that I had overlooked a possibility.

The whole story which starts here http://blog.tp.org/woody/archives/001878.html established that we had drawn "spy" movie, and I was taking the POV of some sort of stereotypical evil genius of spy films complete with bogus schemes to thwart other teams and simple misdirections. (I even used the term "Frickin' laser") I started strong with this, and let it get more subdued each posting until the final awards presentation posting which would be back to my normal voice, normal self. Where the whole controversy started was that some people started in the middle with the reviews and missed the fact that I was writing from the evil spy movie genius POV. In a nutshell, missed the whole gag of making a complete review of all shows and placing our own film head and shoulders above all competition. Which any comic (or otherwise) evil genius spy movie character would do.

So what happened was that people started by reading the reviews, got really bent out of shape when I said our film was the best but never mentioned in that particular article that I was on that team. With that attitude, some read backwards from there and instead of seeing a comic spy character POV thought I was some sick puppy actually out there trying to sabotage other teams.

Things really got out of hand when regular readers who had been following this from the beginning started getting angry at those that hadn't.

What I would do different? Well just like the 48 Hour Film Project everyone gets better each year they do it, and my blog is no different. Looking back at last years coverage, this year was MUCH better. Next year if we draw spy again, I would do this method again with no difference but one, I would leave a disclaimer as a comment during the review portion of the arc pointing readers back to episode one. I would NOT preface it with a disclaimer however.

I wish I'd seen this when it was relevant so I'd have more justification to say "fuck you." Not necessarily because you bashed our film, but the fact that you glorified your own on top of it. "This was a team who like only one of the other teams tonight made the conscious decision to sacrifice nothing in their 48 hours." Yeah, I think everybody in the festival worked their asses off. So, whatever, though you're probably never going to see this, if you're going to be critic, be just and understanding.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)





Advertise here

Support This Site
Google